[Thanks to Robert Pratten for pointing me in the direction of this project - do check out his fantastic articles on transmedia, indie film, and crowdsourcing.]
The Cosmonaut offers two ways for a crowd member to become involved in funding:
1. With any merchandise purchase from the store.
Items begin for as little as 2 Euro for a Welcome Pack, through to t-shirts, Special Edition DVD presales, and real soviet space memorabilia, with the most expensive item 25 Euro.
Any purchase brings the following benefits:
- Name in the film credits as a “Producer”
- The welcome pack consisting of a badge, stickers, and certificate
- Entry into the competition to win a real cosmonaut suit
That is pretty amazing value if you ask me!
2. By becoming an “Investor” for 1000 Euro or more, and signing a contract, you will have share in any profits made from the film.
Crowdsourcing the publicity materials
The Cosmonaut is crowdsourcing some design elements with competitions that are open to the public. They currently have a competition to design the film poster.
Freemium aspects
When the film is finished, the filmmakers will be releasing it online for free to the general public under a creative commons license. They are allowing anyone to reuse or repurpose any element of the film.
By making the film available online for free, and in mashable form, it will increase how many people watch the film, increase the spreadability, and if just a small proportion of these people convert into purchasers, it will be profitable.
Monetisation
The monetisation of this film seems to be entirely through the merchandise store, with no plans for traditional revenue from cinema or TV sales. On first glance, this may appear a bit limited, to not capitalise on the greater film rights. On the other hand, the financial risk associated with the film is lessened due to the advance funding via merchandise sales. There are fewer investors/debtors needing payback. And, the notion behind freemium content is that if the content is of value, it will spread, and you only need a small proportion of people to convert for it to become a success financially.
This might not work on a big budget film, but The Cosmonaut film budget is only 415,000 Euros, of which 67% is being provided by the filmmaking team (their time and resources invested for profit share). All they need to raise in cash is 136,950 Euros to make the film a reality, and they already have achieved 1492 producers in just over 6 months.
They have also staged a music event as an additional film fundraiser. I’m not sure how this went, but from past experience I’ve realised sometimes fundraisers end up costing more in time and resources than are equivalent to funds raised. You can easily fall into the trap where, if everyone who donated their time and resources towards holding the fund raiser simply put that time into their normal job and then donated the proceeds you’d have more money with less effort... (Would love to hear from you if you have had better success in this area than I have, share some tips with us!)
More reasons for the thumbs up:
- Cracker of a film logline and synopsis. This is a movie I want to see!
- The script is provided, so people can work out if it is a movie they want to be involved with. (However, this is a Spanish film, the script is therefore in Spanish, and I can’t read it. Any Spanish speakers out there, I would love if you could read and review it, send me a link to your blog).
- They’ve gained public support from real Russian cosmonauts.
- Really cool stuff for sale in their store, not just “merchandising”, but soviet space themed collector’s items that would be hard to track down another way.
- The crowdsourced design competitions are open to anyone; you don’t have to be a member. This increases number of people participating, and those who get involved in a non-committal manner may upgrade to paying “producer” at a later stage.
- While it’s a Spanish film they have a website with English translation, extending their potential audience.
- Supported by a good filmmaker blog, and easy to link in with Facebook, Twitter, and a variety of other social networking sites.
- Good transparency, clearly naming names of those involved, their experience, what the crowd receives in exchange for their money, and what the film itself is about.
While the website has a nice clean design, it could do with a site map, some additional “pages” with certain information, and easy to find “fact sheet”. For example:
- Some pertinent information for potential investors is gained by downloading the Press Kit, a spot where many in the “crowd” might not think to look.
- There isn’t an obvious link from the main website to the blog (ideally the blog would be hosted on the same site, perhaps under the title “news”).
- The dual language is fantastic in meeting needs of English speakers, but this is not continuous across all media. The Twitter feed, for example, is all in Spanish. I can’t blame them for this – none of my projects are in any language other than English, so they are doing far better than me – but my own selfish personal desire would be to follow them in the language that I can read.
On the whole I am very impressed with The Cosmonaut's crowdfunding business model, am considering a purchase from their store myself, and, perhaps most importantly - I can't wait to watch the film!
Cool. I think it makes a big difference that they have a great pitch, and a fantastic short promo. It shows that are serious, have talent and put faces to a project. Good luck to them!
ReplyDeletethanks for posting this. i'm going to go and buy something from the store and i will let you know how it goes. its too bad they are way offside on North American soil, but you just can't offer the sale of securities on the internet....yet.
ReplyDeletethe one issue i have that you did not mention is that they claim to be putting in a lot of their own capital. to be properly transparent they should have to show the escrow fund and who the trust is held with until such a time that the rest of the funds are raised. the same goes for any producer making claim that have a % of the funds as this is truly leverage and without proof you really are doing a glorified bait and switch. i'm not saying they don't have the funds put away but how many times have people seen the deal where a producer says he has 50% of a deal and then raises the other 50% to then produce the film for less than he originally stated in his ask and provide a less than equal proportion to the people putting up the risk capital?
at the end of the day its just a movie...or is it? Some people are in SHOW BUSINESS...not SHOW SHOW.
cheers and thanks for the great posts.
dave
Thanks for comments :)
ReplyDeleteYes David, you're right - one additional thing they could do to improve is show the complete budget breakdown the same way that The Age of Stupid did. Thank you for pointing that out!
In terms of the %budget they're putting up themselves, this isn't in ca$h, it's the filmmaking team & crew all going unpaid in exchange for pro rata profit share with other investors. Their time is still valued in the budget, but there is no way to put this in escrow as it is not 'money'.
We do this kind of thing quite a bit in low budget Australian filmmaking when there isn't the money to pay full rates, but we still need to acknowledge the value of an individual crew member's input: they become "investors" of the difference, sometimes with the actual contract written as a 'deferment' to be paid out of returns before profit share occurs to other investors.
But you're right : there should be more detail on this budget to make it optimal. I suspect that if you inquired about becoming an "investor" with $1000 or more this additional detail might be in the contract... I have asked the team to comment here to clear up any unanswered questions, so hopefully Gabriella or someone will drop by to address that.
Words are fascinating!
ReplyDeletehttp://startups.com/questions/15565/is-crowd-sourcing-about-outsourcing-or-is-it-about-sourcing-funding of resources, that can be Money or Tasks perfomed (effort).
So Crowd(Out)Sourcing = Crowd-Tasking ?
Or is Crowd-Sourcing = Crowd-Funding?
Hi Jarra,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your question. It is common for a term to have more than one definition, and for the meaning to be different depending on which context or industry it is being applied to.
In the online arts sector, crowd funding is a term used to explain sourcing of funds from many unconnected people who want to see the project made, primarily for artistic merit.
As such, in this industry, crowdfunding is considered a subsect of crowdsourcing because it is about getting the crowd - the public audience - involved (with benefits in addition to finance) rather than traditional investors and financing bodies.
In this context, the crowd is also the audience, which is rather different from many other industries where "crowdsourcing" often has a drawing pool not too dissimilar from who they would consider hiring anyway, rather than who they are selling to.
The film sounds quite interesting. A lost cosmonaut returning to a dead Earth. Very Planet of the Apes.
ReplyDeleteAnd so much freebies for just 2Euros? Hopefully this crowdfunding scheme picks up for indie film makers.
Thanks for your post. In the U.S., though, you could not publicly solicit "investors", as this would violate SEC rules. Otherwise, it's great.
ReplyDeleteEARN GLOBAL MONEY shows you different earning programs from all over the globe and help people to earn money from different earning program owned by different organizations.
ReplyDeletefor more information please visit www.earnglobalmoney.info